|
Post by pipeguy on Nov 7, 2011 10:50:14 GMT -5
(Add up all the games played) ÷ (how many teams 11) then x by .90 I did the math this morning and the answer is 211 games. snipers, crunch, franchise, need to manage their rosters so they don't lose their first overall draft pick.
|
|
|
Post by Hockeygenius on Nov 7, 2011 17:36:40 GMT -5
(Add up all the games played) ÷ (how many teams 11) then x by .90 I did the math this morning and the answer is 211 games. snipers, crunch, franchise, need to manage their rosters so they don't lose their first overall draft pick. That rule no longer exists. We abolished it 2 years ago. I'm sorry that I forgot to change it in the rules section.
|
|
|
Post by pipeguy on Nov 8, 2011 13:48:57 GMT -5
So we can put injuried and minor league players back on our rosters? and have no games played at the end of the years?
|
|
|
Post by Hockeygenius on Nov 8, 2011 19:01:13 GMT -5
So we can put injuried and minor league players back on our rosters? and have no games played at the end of the years? Yup, its about managing your rosters for your benefit. What will will punish is when someone doesn't have enough players dressed and GM inactivity.
|
|
|
Post by thefirm on Nov 8, 2011 22:06:31 GMT -5
So we can put injuried and minor league players back on our rosters? and have no games played at the end of the years? Yup, its about managing your rosters for your benefit. What will will punish is when someone doesn't have enough players dressed and GM inactivity. Funny how it was unacceptable when Keith and I were racing for the bottom in the first year of the draft and rules were changed to disallow this practice, and now all of a sudden it is OK again. NEWS TO ME! I guess we mine aswell say to hell with all the rules I guess!
|
|
|
Post by pipeguy on Nov 9, 2011 1:19:39 GMT -5
So what is the percentage? Is back to the original 80% or dropped altogether?
|
|
|
Post by OilersKick on Nov 10, 2011 20:14:28 GMT -5
So we can put injuried and minor league players back on our rosters? and have no games played at the end of the years? Yup, its about managing your rosters for your benefit. What will will punish is when someone doesn't have enough players dressed and GM inactivity. I think this should change back, after this season we should go back to how it was before, or shouldnt be able to place a injured player into a roster, or have a player who isnt even in the NHL in their roster
|
|
|
Post by TopGuns on Nov 11, 2011 16:24:55 GMT -5
Yup, its about managing your rosters for your benefit. What will will punish is when someone doesn't have enough players dressed and GM inactivity. I think this should change back, after this season we should go back to how it was before, or shouldnt be able to place a injured player into a roster, or have a player who isnt even in the NHL in their roster I agree with Randy mostly... I think that if you want to finnish last you should have to move in and out the players that are not injured but I feel that the minium games played is un inportant if you always have a 20 man roster of NHL players.. there is some skill to managing the roaster then. instead of set it and forget it like some guys are doing. we want participation in the pool and if you had to manage your players week to week it would be more intresting.
|
|